Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add option to adjust contract balance on deployment if already funded #2155

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

saeed-zil
Copy link
Contributor

Please let me know:

  • if you have a better name for the config
  • which config file(s) should I change accordingly?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 14, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchadjust-contract-balance
Testbedself-hosted
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
process-empty/process-empty📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8.59
(-6.41%)
10.42
(82.43%)
produce-full/produce-full📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,892.70
(-4.17%)
2,292.17
(82.57%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

saeed-zil and others added 2 commits January 16, 2025 14:25
@saeed-zil saeed-zil enabled auto-merge January 16, 2025 12:49
@saeed-zil saeed-zil added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 6ecb6af Jan 16, 2025
6 checks passed
@saeed-zil saeed-zil deleted the adjust-contract-balance branch January 16, 2025 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Check behaviour when a Scilla contract is created "over" a previous account
2 participants